
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 92
(By Delegates Ashley, Staton, Anderson, Pethtel, Williams,
Stemple, Faircloth, Mezzatesta and Trump)
[Introduced March 8, 2002; referred to the
Committee on Rules.]
Requesting the Joint Committee on Government and Finance to study
the feasibility of providing for the automatic renewal of
managed timberland classification and farmland classification
for assessment of real property for ad valorem property
taxation, providing a procedure for late filing of
applications to classify property as farmland and providing
for an intermediate level of appeal of erroneous assessments
upon applications requesting that real property be classified
as managed timberland or farmland;

Whereas, Classification of real property as managed timberland
for assessment for purposes of ad valorem property taxation
currently must be applied for every year, requiring the property
owner to go through the procedures of reapplying for such
classification, although in order to qualify, the taxpayer must
implement a certified managed timberland plan approved by the
director of the division of forestry within twenty-four months of
certifying that the property meets the definition of managed timberland; the director of the division of forestry has the
authority to inspect, monitor, review and revoke managed timberland
status if the director finds that the property owner has failed to
meet the approved managed timberland plan, and, therefore the
Legislature finds that the necessity of the requirement of
reapplying for such classification every year in some instances may
serve no beneficial purpose and a review of this requirement may be
beneficial to property owners as well as the State; and

Whereas, Under current law, property owners seeking
classification of their property as farmland for assessment for ad
valorem property taxation must reapply each year in a timely manner
and failure to so reapply results in loss of classification of
their property as farmland for that tax year without any remedy,
even though in many instances, the property is otherwise qualified
to be so classified; and

Whereas, In many instances, the requirement of annually
applying for farmland classification is an onerous burden upon some
property owners, particularly senior citizens with infirmities and
disabilities and surviving spouses of deceased property owners who
are unaware of the annual filing requirement until after the filing
deadline expires; in many such instances, the unintentional failure to meet the filing requirement results in the taxpayer incurring an
increased tax burden even though the taxpayer would otherwise be
entitled to the farmland classification had the taxpayer timely
filed; and

Whereas, County Commissions sitting as boards of equalization
and review currently have no authority to hear appeals for review
of erroneous ad valorem property assessment classification; and

Whereas, A property owner aggrieved by an adverse valuation or
classification of property as managed timber or farmland has no
recourse other than a direct appeal to the state tax commissioner,
and a procedure for an intermediate appeal procedure on a local
level should be considered; therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

That the Joint Committee on Government and Finance is hereby
requested to study the feasibility of providing for the automatic
renewal of managed timberland classification and farmland
classification for assessment of real property for ad valorem
property taxation, providing a procedure for late filing of
applications to classify property as farmland and providing for an
intermediate level of appeal of erroneous assessments upon
applications requesting that real property be classified as managed
timberland or farmland; and, be it

Further Resolved, That the Joint Committee on Government and
Finance report to the regular session of the Legislature, 2003, on
its findings, conclusions and recommendations, together with drafts
of any legislation necessary to effectuate its recommendations;
and, be it

Further Resolved, That the expenses necessary to conduct this
study, to prepare a report and to draft the necessary legislation
be paid from legislative appropriations to the Joint Committee on
Government and Finance.